More consistent contract parameter naming
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,12 +17,11 @@ contract Token is Upgradeable, BasicToken {
|
||||
decimals = 18;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function mintFor(address _recipient, uint256 _amount, uint _proposalId) onlyRegistryContractFor('Operator') public returns (bool success) {
|
||||
totalSupply_ = totalSupply_.add(_amount);
|
||||
balances[_recipient] = balances[_recipient].add(_amount);
|
||||
function mintFor(address recipientAddress, uint256 amount, uint proposalId) onlyRegistryContractFor('Operator') public {
|
||||
totalSupply_ = totalSupply_.add(amount);
|
||||
balances[recipientAddress] = balances[recipientAddress].add(amount);
|
||||
|
||||
LogMint(_recipient, _amount, _proposalId);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
LogMint(recipientAddress, amount, proposalId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user