kredits/contracts
kredits
/
contracts
9
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 21 Pull Requests Actions Projects 1 Releases 8 Activity

Use correct RBTC token address for reimbursements #245

New Issue
Open
opened 2023-08-24 14:17:59 +00:00 by raucao · 0 comments
raucao commented 2023-08-24 14:17:59 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

In theory we can also allow other tokens in the future, but if we keep the token slot in the storage at all, then we should at least not use the WBTC address.

In theory we can also allow other tokens in the future, but if we keep the token slot in the storage at all, then we should at least not use the WBTC address.
raucao added this to the RSK mainnet launch project 2023-08-24 14:18:05 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
master
new-final-deploy
new-final-deploy-2
reimbursement-export
staging
legacy
addresses/rsk-testnet-raucao-1
ipfs-defaults
deletemewhendone
feature/184-improve_withdrawal
tests/contracts-contribution
tests/contracts-kit
kit/add-vault-app
feature/ipfs_hash_in_add_response
chore/bootstrap-on-travis
chore/remove-direct-aragon-cli-dependency
chore/update-dependencies-1
fix/ipfs-config
apm-hack
wtf/package-lock
feature/contributor-balance
feature/constructor-options
v7.4.0
v7.3.0
v7.2.0
v7.1.0
v7.0.0
v7.0.1
v7.0.0-beta.0
v6.0.0
v5.5.0
v5.4.0
v5.3.0
v5.2.0
v5.1.1
v5.1.0
v5.0.0
v4.0.2
v4.0.1
v4.0.0
v3.0.2
v3.0.1
v3.0.0
Labels
Clear labels   
good first issue

Good for newcomers

  
ipfs

   
rsk

   
scaling
  
bug

Something is not working

  
dev environment

Config, builds, CI, deployment, etc.

  
docs

Documentation

  
duplicate

This issue or pull request already exists

  
enhancement

Improving existing functionality

  
feature

New functionality

  
idea

Something to consider

  
invalid

Not a bug

  
kredits-1

Small contribution

  
kredits-2

Medium contribution

  
kredits-3

Large contribution

  
question

Looking for an answer

  
release
major

  
release
minor

  
release
patch

  
security

All your base are belong to us

  
ui/ux

User interface, process design, etc.

  
wontfix

This won't be fixed

No Label
good first issue
ipfs
rsk
scaling
bug
dev environment
docs
duplicate
enhancement
feature
idea
invalid
kredits-1
kredits-2
kredits-3
question
release
major
release
minor
release
patch
security
ui/ux
wontfix
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
RSK mainnet launch
Assignees
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: kredits/contracts#245
No description provided.
Delete Branch "%!s(<nil>)"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?