Fix creating proposals from IRC #21

Closed
opened 2018-04-22 14:42:30 +00:00 by bumi · 6 comments
bumi commented 2018-04-22 14:42:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Creating proposals from IRC is currently borken as it used a createProposal method that is now in the github integration script: https://github.com/67P/hubot-kredits/blob/master/index.js#L84

maybe we can even remove that feature right now (even though I think I like it) and plan a better one. The main issue right now is that the github username has to be used in the chat message and not the IRC username.

What do you think?

Creating proposals from IRC is currently borken as it used a `createProposal` method that is now in the github integration script: https://github.com/67P/hubot-kredits/blob/master/index.js#L84 maybe we can even remove that feature right now (even though I think I like it) and plan a better one. The main issue right now is that the github username has to be used in the chat message and not the IRC username. What do you think?
raucao commented 2018-04-22 14:51:27 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I think it would be easy to add the IRC nicks to the accounts array in the IPFS profile, but it would probably be a bit clunky to use anyway, because you have to cram so much info in one line of chat, with the only one and true sort order and punctuation.

I think it would be easy to add the IRC nicks to the accounts array in the IPFS profile, but it would probably be a bit clunky to use anyway, because you have to cram so much info in one line of chat, with the only one and true sort order and punctuation.
bumi commented 2018-04-22 16:19:32 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

it's not to bad imo: send 1000 Kredits to raucau for hacking hubot

it's not to bad imo: `send 1000 Kredits to raucau for hacking hubot`
raucao commented 2018-04-22 16:41:42 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

That's a mighty short description and not very useful for presenting it to everybody in the project in the frontend. Also, it encourages bad form like all-lowercase letters, no category, etc., as proven by your example. :)

We'd actually have to validate the contribution against the schema, add error messages for categories, etc.

That's a mighty short description and not very useful for presenting it to everybody in the project in the frontend. Also, it encourages bad form like all-lowercase letters, no category, etc., as proven by your example. :) We'd actually have to validate the contribution against the schema, add error messages for categories, etc.
bumi commented 2018-04-22 17:34:39 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

the description could be as long as one wants, though you're right chat messages tend to be short.
I like the ease of creating a proposal like this.
Could imagine a category "misc" for such smaller proposals.

the description could be as long as one wants, though you're right chat messages tend to be short. I like the ease of creating a proposal like this. Could imagine a category "misc" for such smaller proposals.
bumi commented 2019-04-03 20:27:42 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

do we still want this?

do we still want this?
raucao commented 2019-04-03 20:29:05 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I think not. Re-open if you disagree. :)

I think not. Re-open if you disagree. :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: kredits/hubot-kredits#21