kredits/kredits-web
9
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull Requests 1 Actions Releases 18 Activity

Use external/self-sovereign identity #26

New Issue
Open
opened 2017-07-11 08:32:30 +00:00 by bumi · 6 comments
bumi commented 2017-07-11 08:32:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

Can we use uport for contributor identity management?
Do we then still need metamask - is it an alternative?
https://developer.uport.me/

Can we use uport for contributor identity management? Do we then still need metamask - is it an alternative? https://developer.uport.me/
raucao commented 2018-04-08 12:37:26 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

Looks like we wouldn't need Metamask then: https://developer.uport.me/guides.html#signing-transactions

Looks like we wouldn't need Metamask then: https://developer.uport.me/guides.html#signing-transactions
bumi commented 2019-04-04 10:22:15 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

bumping this one, to look at uPort again. Seems quite some things happened since last year.
though yes, probably uPort users would not use metamask.

bumping this one, to look at uPort again. Seems quite some things happened since last year. though yes, probably uPort users would not use metamask.
raucao commented 2019-04-04 10:26:27 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

I'd personally prefer to wait until the DIF releases code and protocol for their standardized identity solutions this summer.

I'd personally prefer to wait until the DIF releases code and protocol for their standardized identity solutions this summer.
bumi commented 2019-04-04 10:27:30 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

do you have a link for that?

do you have a link for that?
raucao commented 2019-04-04 10:35:51 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

No, just following podcasts and birdsite and such. Apparently they're going to have something out by May or June.

https://identity.foundation/

No, just following podcasts and birdsite and such. Apparently they're going to have something out by May or June. https://identity.foundation/
raucao commented 2022-02-04 17:29:00 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Copy Link
Copy Source

RSK has a W3C-compatible DID solution now, called rlogin:

You can try it out here, and manually edit the data, too: https://identity.rifos.org/

RSK has a W3C-compatible DID solution now, called rlogin: * https://github.com/rsksmart/rlogin * https://developers.rsk.co/rif/rlogin/get-started/ * https://hackernoon.com/rlogin-the-new-authentication-libraries-for-blockchain-based-apps-h619330z You can try it out here, and manually edit the data, too: https://identity.rifos.org/
raucao added the feature label 2026-07-25 18:27:20 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
bug
Something is not working
 dev environment
Config, builds, CI, deployment, etc.
 docs
Documentation
 duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
 enhancement
Improving existing functionality
 feature
New functionality
 idea
Something to consider
 invalid
Not a bug
 kredits-1
Small contribution
 kredits-2
Medium contribution
 kredits-3
Large contribution
 question
Looking for an answer
release
major
release
minor
release
patch
security
All your base are belong to us
 ui/ux
User interface, process design, etc.
 wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
bkero (bkero) bumi (bumi) fsmanuel (fsmanuel) galfert (galfert) greg (Greg) haythem (haythem) hueso (hueso) raucao (Râu Cao) slvrbckt (Nick Jennings)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: kredits/kredits-web#26
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?