I changed the whole layout, so one can see more things at once, and more importantly, all details for the actual contributions. This branch is currently deployed ton https://kredits.kosmos.org so you can check it out there as well.
(Hint: In order to run the branch locally, you now only need to start your IPFS daemon. Everything else comes from the Internet.)
I changed the whole layout, so one can see more things at once, and more importantly, all details for the actual contributions. This branch is currently deployed ton https://kredits.kosmos.org so you can check it out there as well.


_(Hint: In order to run the branch locally, you now only need to start your IPFS daemon. Everything else comes from the Internet.)_
fsmanuel
(Migrated from github.com)
approved these changes 2018-06-18 10:54:09 +00:00
fsmanuel
(Migrated from github.com)
left a comment
Copy Link
Copy Source
Only one small change.
I would suggest to move "Add Contributor" below the "Contributors" list but that is not blocking.
Only one small change.
I would suggest to move "Add Contributor" below the "Contributors" list but that is not blocking.
I would suggest to move "Add Contributor" below the "Contributors" list but that is not blocking.
I tried that first and it wasn't great. But there's #74 anyway, because this is not something that should be on the index in the first place.
> I would suggest to move "Add Contributor" below the "Contributors" list but that is not blocking.
I tried that first and it wasn't great. But there's #74 anyway, because this is not something that should be on the index in the first place.
As far as I understand the code we already handle `hasAccounts` in `getCurrentUser`:
https://github.com/67P/kredits-web/blob/master/app/services/kredits.js#L147-L162
but figured the information that one should talk to a core memeber is valueable to get ppl. involved.
Completely agree! But that will have to be part of the general onboarding for anonymous users I think. Lots to improve there, because right now there's zero information for them.
> but figured the information that one should talk to a core memeber is valueable to get ppl. involved.
Completely agree! But that will have to be part of the general onboarding for anonymous users I think. Lots to improve there, because right now there's zero information for them.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
I changed the whole layout, so one can see more things at once, and more importantly, all details for the actual contributions. This branch is currently deployed ton https://kredits.kosmos.org so you can check it out there as well.
(Hint: In order to run the branch locally, you now only need to start your IPFS daemon. Everything else comes from the Internet.)
Only one small change.
I would suggest to move "Add Contributor" below the "Contributors" list but that is not blocking.
@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@{{#if kredits.hasAccounts }}{{#if kredits.currentUser}}{{kredits.currentUser.name}}{{#if kredits.currentUserIsCore}}(core){{/if}}Can we make it
@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@{{#if kredits.hasAccounts }}{{#if kredits.currentUser}}{{kredits.currentUser.name}}{{#if kredits.currentUserIsCore}}(core){{/if}}Sounds to me like that should be a single computed property.
I tried that first and it wasn't great. But there's #74 anyway, because this is not something that should be on the index in the first place.
You are right! I was about to say that but figured the information that one should talk to a core memeber is valueable to get ppl. involved.
@@ -4,0 +5,4 @@{{#if kredits.hasAccounts }}{{#if kredits.currentUser}}{{kredits.currentUser.name}}{{#if kredits.currentUserIsCore}}(core){{/if}}As far as I understand the code we already handle
hasAccountsingetCurrentUser:https://github.com/67P/kredits-web/blob/master/app/services/kredits.js#L147-L162
Completely agree! But that will have to be part of the general onboarding for anonymous users I think. Lots to improve there, because right now there's zero information for them.
why does that WIP bot say this one is still WIP? is it?
I think that's a great optimization to the current long list.
let's merge it.
I think the bot picked it up from a commit message. Thanks.