Add place photos NIP, update reviews NIP
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# NIP-XX: Place Reviews
|
||||
|
||||
`draft` `optional`
|
||||
|
||||
## Abstract
|
||||
|
||||
This NIP defines a standardized event format for decentralized place reviews using Nostr. Reviews are tied to real-world locations (e.g. OpenStreetMap POIs) via tags, and include structured, multi-aspect ratings, a binary recommendation signal, and optional contextual metadata.
|
||||
@@ -11,13 +13,9 @@ The design prioritizes:
|
||||
* Flexibility for different place types
|
||||
* Efficient geospatial querying using geohashes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Event Kind
|
||||
|
||||
`kind: 30315` (suggested; subject to coordination)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
`kind: 30360`
|
||||
|
||||
## Tags
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -51,8 +49,6 @@ Examples:
|
||||
["i", "osm:way:987654"]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Geospatial Tags
|
||||
|
||||
#### `g` — Geohash
|
||||
@@ -91,8 +87,6 @@ Geospatial queries are performed using the `g` tag.
|
||||
|
||||
Note: Other queries (e.g. fetching reviews for a specific place) are performed using the `i` tag and are outside the scope of geospatial querying.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content (JSON)
|
||||
|
||||
The event `content` MUST be valid JSON matching the following schema.
|
||||
@@ -183,8 +177,6 @@ The event `content` MUST be valid JSON matching the following schema.
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Example
|
||||
|
||||
### Restaurant Review Event
|
||||
@@ -232,8 +224,6 @@ The event `content` MUST be valid JSON matching the following schema.
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Semantics
|
||||
|
||||
### Ratings
|
||||
@@ -248,8 +238,6 @@ The event `content` MUST be valid JSON matching the following schema.
|
||||
* Clients MAY define and interpret aspect keys
|
||||
* Clients SHOULD reuse commonly established aspect keys where possible
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendation Signal
|
||||
|
||||
The `recommend` field represents a binary verdict:
|
||||
@@ -259,8 +247,6 @@ The `recommend` field represents a binary verdict:
|
||||
|
||||
Clients SHOULD strongly encourage users to provide this value.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Familiarity
|
||||
|
||||
Represents user familiarity with the place:
|
||||
@@ -271,8 +257,6 @@ Represents user familiarity with the place:
|
||||
|
||||
Clients MAY use this signal for weighting during aggregation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Optional metadata about the visit.
|
||||
@@ -281,8 +265,6 @@ Optional metadata about the visit.
|
||||
* `duration_minutes` represents time spent
|
||||
* `party_size` indicates group size
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Interoperability
|
||||
|
||||
This specification defines a content payload only.
|
||||
@@ -292,8 +274,6 @@ This specification defines a content payload only.
|
||||
|
||||
Content payloads SHOULD NOT include place identifiers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
### No Place Field in Content
|
||||
@@ -320,8 +300,6 @@ Multiple resolutions balance:
|
||||
* small event size
|
||||
* early-stage discoverability
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Work
|
||||
|
||||
* Standardized aspect vocabularies
|
||||
@@ -329,15 +307,7 @@ Multiple resolutions balance:
|
||||
* Indexing/aggregation services
|
||||
* Cross-protocol mappings
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
* Clients SHOULD validate all input
|
||||
* Malicious or spam reviews may require external moderation or reputation systems
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Copyright
|
||||
|
||||
This NIP is public domain.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user