Rename healthcheck to PreflightChecker #49

Merged
bumi merged 2 commits from preflight-check into master 2018-06-07 14:39:08 +00:00
2 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
const ethers = require('ethers');
const RSVP = require('rsvp');
const Healthcheck = require('./utils/healthcheck');
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
const Preflight = require('./utils/preflight');
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
const ABIS = {
Contributors: require('./abis/Contributors.json'),
@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ class Kredits {
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
return this.contracts[name];
}
healthcheck() {
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
return new Healthcheck(this).check();
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
preflightChecks() {
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
return new Preflight(this).check();
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
}
}

raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.
raucao commented 2018-06-07 14:00:12 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)
Review

Why not just Preflight.check() if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

Why not just `Preflight.check()` if there's a checker method in that module anyway? I think it would read/look a bit nicer.

View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
class Healthcheck {
class Preflight {
constructor(kredits) {
this.kredits = kredits;
}
@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ class Healthcheck {
}
}
module.exports = Healthcheck;
module.exports = Preflight;